The kind of sex I'm familiar with is the conventional sex, which is between a man and a woman. Sex is what these two genders should mutually enjoy. However, it has been said that most women have to ride a long "journey" before they reach orgasm as something called the "G-spot" in women's vaginas is very hard to find and most men who are lucky to find it have a mischievous curve on their equipment, lol. So, this is why we have cases of "one minute man", when a man reaches his final destination and the woman is just about to put the key in the ignition meaning she has not even started the car yet. Some people say men enjoy sex more because when they ejaculate, it shows a sign of satisfaction, absolute orgasm and gratification. Others say women enjoy it more especially without condom, hmmm, I think everyone enjoys this one. We all enjoy those things that will get us into serious trouble.
She's definitely faking it, isn't she? |
Many women have confessed that they have not experienced orgasm and a large percentage of this women are those who are sexually experienced, mostly married women. These women have to live with having sex like it is a boring routine and they just lie there thinking "just get it over with". This brings me to my topic of the day. Is the world itself sexist? Is the world misogynist? If not, why would there be a recreational sexual drug specially created to enhance men's performance in bed and there has not been a drug that can either assist women to reach orgasm like men or at least a drug that helps men to locate the G-spot before they ejaculate?!
The drug called Viagra is designed to be ingested by men in order to make hot blood rush into their organs so they can demonstrate like wild animals in bed. But sex was not created to be enjoyed by the men folk alone, there should be a female viagra so that two can play! How can a guy be feeling like a god in bed, making the woman think she is a bore and sometimes even with all the drug use, the man does not even hit the G-spot after all! Pscchew! This is so unfair! They say men need Viagra because of erectile dysfunction, well, then women should have a drug for orgasm misplacement!
An outcry against Viagra now is that it is a great contributor to the dissolution of many marriages. This is because the use of viagra is rampant among the elderly men. Think about it, say Daddy is 66 years old and Mummy is 52, I do not think their ages should mean the end of their sex lives. Whatever it is they have been doing, let them continue to do it. But because Daddy has found the miracle of viagra and Mummy does not have the stamina to withstand the incessant horniness of Daddy which is the effect of viagra, Daddy goes out to look for a younger peperempe! How many of us have had to watch Daddies leave their wives at home to go and gallivant about town in the arms of school girls? Ehn? Did you guys hear about Danny Devito's divorce? The dwarfish American Actor divorced his wife, Rhea Perlman of 30 years? He was married to a woman he has known all his life and after three decades together, he just lost interest? What else could be the cause? The divorce is very viagra-ish.
Hugh Hefner, 86 years old Chief Creative Officer of Playboy Enterprise and Poster boy for Viagra |
Is it not unfair that women do not have anything to resort to? Why should there be a drug that improves men's sexual activities and there has been none for women so far? Do you not think that women should have a sex-enhancing drug too? If V is for viagra and vagina, women should have some sex miracle drugs called "Diagra" or "Piagra" too? . I think we all know what the D and P in Diagra and Piagra stands for.